The paper pointed out the following options to fit GLMM using R:
- glmer
- glmmML
- glmm (from the repeated package)
- glmmADMB
- MCMCglmm
- glmmBUGS
- glmmPQL
- BUGS (through R2WinBUGS)
- glmmAK
And I would like to add one more, npmlreg.
I am not aware of the glmmAK package before. From the first glance, it seems to be very promising in the sense that it seems to allow non-Gaussian random effect in a Bayesian framework, something similar to what npmlreg does with ML method.
============== edited on March 3 ====================
DPpackage is another package that can estimate GLMM in a Bayesian framework.
============== edited on March 5 ====================
ASReml/ASReml-R is another choice. It is not free software, but it does seem to have some unique strengths. Maybe I should download a demo copy and try it myself.
============== edited on March 29 ===================
hglm is another possibility.
I am not aware of the glmmAK package before. From the first glance, it seems to be very promising in the sense that it seems to allow non-Gaussian random effect in a Bayesian framework, something similar to what npmlreg does with ML method.
============== edited on March 3 ====================
DPpackage is another package that can estimate GLMM in a Bayesian framework.
============== edited on March 5 ====================
ASReml/ASReml-R is another choice. It is not free software, but it does seem to have some unique strengths. Maybe I should download a demo copy and try it myself.
============== edited on March 29 ===================
hglm is another possibility.
2 comments:
So, based on your experience, which package would you suggest using?
They each has unique advantages and weaknesses. In my work, I use glmer ("lme4" package) and allvc ("npmlreg" package) a lot; and I am starting to get in the world of Bayesian analysis, and MCMCglmm is a real life saver.
Post a Comment